A sequence of good functions can have a badly behaved limit. The issue is whether convergence becomes accurate at one common stage for all points. Uniform convergence supplies that control, but it does not justify every operation equally: integration is more forgiving than differentiation.
1 The order of quantifiers
A sequence converges pointwise to if for every and there is , possibly depending on , with for . It converges uniformly if one works for every . Equivalently, when these suprema are finite.
On , tends to 0 for and to 1 at . It is not uniform: for every , values just below 1 make arbitrarily close to 1 while the limiting function is zero. The supremum error is 1, though it need not be attained.
Uniform-limit theorem. A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
Proof. Fix and . Choose with uniform error below . Continuity of that one makes for sufficiently close to . The triangle inequality bounds by the two uniform errors and this middle term.
2 Interchanging integrals
Theorem. If are Riemann integrable on and converge uniformly to , then is integrable and .
Proof. For any partition, . Choose first making the second term small, then a partition making the first term small. This proves integrability. Finally
The same proof uses rectangle volume for multiple Riemann integrals.
Pointwise convergence alone is insufficient. On define for and zero otherwise. Every fixed point eventually has value zero, but every integral is 1. This example is integrable though not continuous; continuous triangular spikes provide the same failure.
3 Series and the uniform Cauchy criterion
A function series converges uniformly when its partial sums do. Since is complete, this is equivalent to: for every , some makes
Pointwise completeness supplies a candidate sum; the uniform tail bound then shows uniform convergence to it.
Weierstrass M-test. If for all and , then converges absolutely and uniformly. The proof bounds every tail by the corresponding scalar tail and applies the criterion.
For on , choose . Its sum is continuous and the series can be integrated term by term on any subinterval. This does not alone permit termwise differentiation up to the endpoints.
4 Differentiation needs stronger control
Uniform convergence of alone does not imply convergence of derivatives: tends uniformly to zero, but for every , not the derivative of the zero limit.
Derivative theorem. Suppose , converges, and converges uniformly to . Then converges uniformly to a function with .
Proof. Uniform convergence makes continuous. Let and define . The identity yields uniform error at most . The fundamental theorem gives .
The common-value hypothesis prevents drifting constants: has derivative zero but no function limit.
Exercises with complete solutions
E1 Foundation. Determine whether converges uniformly to zero on and on .
S1. On the supremum is , so convergence is uniform. On the half-line the supremum is 1, approached as , so it is not uniform. Pointwise convergence still holds there.
E2 Series. Prove converges uniformly on . May its derivative series be declared uniformly convergent from this argument?
S2. Bound each term by and use the M-test. Differentiating would produce ; at that series is harmonic and diverges. Therefore no uniform derivative-series claim is valid on all .
E3 Interchange. Calculate using uniform convergence.
S3. The uniform error from is at most , so the limit integral is . Direct evaluation verifies it.
E4 Domain dependence. Show converges uniformly to zero on every with , despite its failure on .
S4. For , the supremum on is . The allowed stage can depend on ; no single estimate remains small as approaches 1.
Summary
Uniform convergence controls all domain points at one stage. It preserves continuity and permits integration on a fixed finite interval. Differentiation requires control of derivatives plus one anchored value. Always name the domain, because uniformity can disappear when it expands.